0086-21-58386256
Using Mill's harm principle, the answer was obviously "no." The fact that society deems certain actions immoral does not in itself justify legal coercion by the state. In Law, Morality, and Society, a collection of essays in honor of H.L.A. Hart, Joel Feinberg published an article he titled "Harm and Self-Interest." There he laid out ...
While Mill's vision of a liberal-minded world is not what we see today, his 'harm principle' continues to be discussed and impacts law even today. Read Comments Copy link
Mill's "one very simple principle"—that liberty may be restricted always and only to prevent harm to another—is over-simple. So too is the related categorical …
5. Implications of the Harm Principle a. Freedom of all thought and conduct not harmful to others 6. Mill's utilitarian justification of the Harm Principle a. Even when they don't …
This article addresses the long-standing problem of how to understand Mill's famous harm principle in light of his failure to specify what counts as "harm" in On Liberty. I argue that standard accounts restricting "harm" to only certain negative consequences fail to do justice to the text, and that this fact forces us to rethink Mill's defense of individual …
So, Mill's "one very simple principle" — that liberty may be restricted always and only to prevent harm to another — is over-simple. So too is the related categorical approach to liberty that approves all applications of the harm principle and rejects all cases of paternalism, censorship, offense regulation, and legal moralism.
prevention of harm. The harm principle has had many defenders since Mill's time, and I cannot examine all of their positions in full detail. For some of its defend-ers, the harm principle operates as a constraint on the legal prohibition of moral wrongs that have been identified independently of it. For
Published in 1859, John Stuart Mill's On Liberty is one of the most celebrated defences of free speech ever written. In this elongated essay, Mill aims to defend what he refers to as "one very simple …
1 In this respect, my reformulation differs from that of Ripstein (2006), since Ripstein proposes his sovereignty principle as an alternative to Mill's harm principle, albeit an alternative suggested by one of Mill's passing remarks.My proposal is a refinement of the harm principle that, I believe, Mill could and should have accepted. …
The Harm Principle is a concept developed by British philosopher John Stuart Mill in his seminal work "On Liberty." The principle states that individuals should be free to act as they wish, as long as their actions do not harm others. This principle is often used in discussions about personal liberty and government intervention.. In NCERT …
Mill's harm principle would apply to a case like this. There is a potentially significant difference between acutely life-threatening harms and other harms. For example, one possibility is that James would not die even if …
The harm principle is often explained as "your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins.". In other words, people should be free to act as they wish as long as their actions do not cause harm to others. The …
But this attempt to preserve the rights-violation reading of the harm principle by introducing a distinct social welfare principle runs headlong into Mill's claim that the harm principle is to "govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control," by which he means to say that any proposed ...
Perhaps the most thought-provoking contribution to consider within liberalism is the harm principle. John Stuart Mill (1859) made a clear distinction between self-regarding and other-regarding actions. ... Societal attitudes towards pornography are a good illustration of Mill's distinction between self-regarding actions and other-regarding ...
Any help with objections to the Harm Principle would be greatly appreciated to help me further understand the idea. Answer by Geoffrey Klempner. J.S. Mill's Harm Principle is an essential component in his case in On …
The HT and Mill's harm principle. My strategy is to select from the disparate sources cited in support of the HT a plausible, general moral principle that identifies conditions for justified state intervention in the free actions of individuals, and to determine which parental medical decisions will therefore warrant interference.
Perhaps the most basic issue in this chapter, then, is whether Mill's harm principle actually makes sense. Mill acknowledges that people are not fully isolated from society, and that their actions can affect others. In principle then, one could make a case that any particular activity causes such harm to other people that the need to respect ...
Mill wrote what is known as the 'harm principle' as an expression of the idea that the right to self-determination is not unlimited. An action which results in doing harm to another is not only wrong, but wrong enough that the state can …
John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle and Free Speech: Expanding the Notion of Harm Melina Constantine Bell Washington and Lee University Email: bellm@wlu.edu Abstract This article advocates employing John Stuart Mill's harm principle to set the boundary for unregulated free speech, and his Greatest Happiness Principle to regulate speech outside
Mill's original harm principle was based on a monistic utilitarianism. There remain adherents of such a utilitarianism, but more influential today is some version of …
On Liberty puts forward the "harm principle" that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, ... By Mill's time, the principle of utility possessed a long history stretching back to the 1730's (with roots going further back to Hobbes, Locke, and even to Epicurus). ...
For Mill's principle, only the resulting public harm matters. As soon as the risk of "perceptible hurt" is present, interference is justified. II Joseph Raz refashions the argument for the harm principle, aiming to avoid the difficulties inherent in Mill's defense of the liberty to plan one's own life. Rather than
The question of harm and its definition typically arises in relation to J.S. Mill's Liberty Principle "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." (On Liberty, 1859) But what exactly constitutes 'harm'?
The principle is a central tenet of the political philosophy known as liberalism and was first proposed by English philosopher John …
Therefore, when personal interests interfere, an action may oppose to Mill's harm principle but sound reasonable when looked in other perspectives. After analyzing the appropriateness of regulating certain actions, let us move on by looking at the regulation of words and thoughts. Mill emphasizes on complete freedom of thought and discussion.
This article addresses the long-standing problem of how to understand Mill's famous harm principle in light of his failure to specify what counts as "harm" in On Liberty.I argue that …
This article advocates employing John Stuart Mill's harm principle to set the boundary for unregulated free speech, and his Greatest Happiness Principle to regulate speech outside that boundary ...
2.3 Mill's Harm Principle and Hate Speech. Another difficult case is hate speech. Most European liberal democracies have limitations on hate speech, but it is debatable whether these can be justified by the harm principle as formulated by Mill. One would have to show that such speech violated rights, directly and in the first instance.
Mill's passion for individuality drives the protection in the harm principle, and the restriction of morality to the enforceable. This calls for compensating widening of the conception of harm. The result is a radical reshaping of the principle of utility as governing the art of life as whole, and of the whole conception of utilitarianism and ...
Mill's Harm Principle: A Study in the Application of On Liberty — Published on May 12, 2023 English philosopher and political economist John Stuart Mill argued that people learn by choosing: this is how they become creative and productive individuals. For this reason, and because he felt that individuals are typically the most capable ...
The harm principle is a key idea in Mill's political philosophy that limits the interference of society with the individual to prevent harm to others. The article explains …
Abstract. John Stuart Mill's famous statement of the harm principle in his "Introductory" to On Liberty—pulled out of context and denuded of Mill's sophisticated philosophical …
This article advocates employing John Stuart Mill's harm principle to set the boundary for unregulated free speech, and his Greatest Happiness Principle to …