0086-21-58386256
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL 920 OF 2019 ARISING OUT OF S.L.P.(CRIMINAL) NO. 10707 OF 2019 KANWAR PAL SINGH ..... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER..... RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T SANJIV KHANNA, J. Leave …
ORDER. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. On the application made by the petitioner for grant of a licence under Section 3 of the Karnataka Regulations of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 (for short 'the said Act of 2011'), Form-B1 has …
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1767 of 2017 M/S Sidhbali Stone Crusher & others ...Petitioners State of Uttarakhand & another...Respondents With Writ Petition (M/S) No. 433 of 2017 Ajeet Stone Industries ...Petitioner Union of India & Others ...Respondents Ms. Sheetal, Advocate holding brief …
It held that the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 63. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed.
Hon'ble B.S Verma, J. (Intervention Application No. 3205 of 2010) Bramhachari Dayanand is present on behalf of the applicant Matri Sadan through its trustees Swami Nigmanand Saraswati and Brahmchari Dayanand Disciple of Swami Shri Shivanand Ji Maharaj, Matri Sadan, Jagjeetpur, Kankhal, Hardwar, Uttarakhand.
12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Ashok Stone Crusher,... v. State Of Uttarakhand... on CaseMine.
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be made on the finished items of stone i.e. …
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Tungabhadra Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Tungabhadra Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine. Log In. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body …
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel …
Write better code with AI Code review. Manage code changes
Whether services provided by State Government of Rajasthan is governed by applicability of Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 under entry number 5 and whether Vinayak Stone Crusher is taxable person in this case to discharge GST under reverse charge mechanism or whether given service is covered by exclusion …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . on CaseMine. ... Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . Supreme Court Of India Mar 14, 2000; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher …
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in …
It held that the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on CaseMine. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Punjab-Haryana High Court M/S Kc Stone Crushing Co vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 4 February, 2021 Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill ... All Dimasa challenged in Supreme Court. However, in the said judgement Students Union, passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no Dima-Hasao District discussion in respect …
JUDGMENT . Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA for R 1. 1. The petitioners claim to be involved in the business of stone crushing under the valid permission granted by the authorities concerned and are aggrieved of the Government order bearing No. 1018-JK (GAD) of 2020 dated 29.10.2020, whereby the respondent No. 1 has accorded sanction …
However, in the said judgement passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no discussion in respect of any bar to release of vehicles on superdari. Order dt. 7.5.2019 passed by Honble Supreme Court in In the said case, an order dated 10.1.2019 passed by NGT in . I.A. No. 22/2019 in O.A. No. 670/2018 had been challenged.
Himachal Pradesh High Court M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 November, 2023 Bench: Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Jyotsna …
The Supreme Court, in a judgment authored by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, emphasised the adverse effects of illegal power crushers on the environment and health of the citizens residing in the …
directed the stoppage of operations of stone quarries in the Sarisua Hills. Aggrieved thereby, the Appellants, who were the lease holders of these stone quarries, filed an application for impleadment which was rejected by the NGT on 04.12.2019. On 18.02.2020, the NGT disposed of the Original Application by directing that no mining
Get free access to the complete judgment in State Of Uttarakhand And Others v. New Taral Stone Crusher . on CaseMine.
This Court in CST v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P...2(e-1) of the U.P Act appears to be similar to the definition under consideration.7. In view of the judgment of this Court in Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd...have taken, the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Kher Stone Crusher v. G.M, District Industries Centre (1990) 79 …
tition No.2163/2022 are also engaged in similar business. Their grievance is common.According to the petitioners, till very recently they used to be granted quarry …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company v. State of U.P. and Another on CaseMine. ... This is also the view of the Supreme Court in the judgement reported in 1970 (1) SCC 121: The Board of High School and intermediate Education, U.P. and others vs. Kumari Chitra Srivastava and others. …
2. respondents had inspected the quarry on 28-05-2014 and subsequently issued a demand notice on 30-12-2014 for payment of an amount of Rs.98,26,800/-; that as against the demand notice, the petitioner filed a revision petition on 06-03-2015 before the 1 st respondent; that the said revision petition was disposed of on 27-09-2021 by the 1 st …
The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of A.P. 4386. This case relates to the petitioner herein himself.
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.
Get Solution & Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *
O R D E R. 1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the …
O R D E R. 1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the stone crushers shall not be permitted to operate in the absence of requisite pollution prevention and control systems was passed without hearing the appellants.. 2 The …
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND Writ Petition No. 2413 of 2012(M/S) Kumaun Stone Crusher Association and others Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.Respondents With Writ Petition No. 2494 of 2012 (M/S) M/s Uttaranchal Associates Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and …
PER C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The assessee is in appeal against the order dated 14.10.2008 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in the matter of an assessment made under sec.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2005-06.
crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 62. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed. Reliance is placed on Two Judge Bench in
Source: Allahabad High Court. Why in News? Recently, the Allahabad High Court in the matter of Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company v. State of U.P. and Anr., has held that in a civilized society, principles of natural justice ought to be followed in order to maintain rule of law. What was the Background of Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher …